<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pac-10 Position Breakdown: Offensive Line &#8211; Cal Bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allpac10.com/pac-10-position-breakdown-offensive-line-cal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allpac10.com/pac-10-position-breakdown-offensive-line-cal/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Ten Schools. One Site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:38:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Consolazio</title>
		<link>http://www.allpac10.com/pac-10-position-breakdown-offensive-line-cal/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Consolazio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allpac10.com/?p=465#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hey everyone, Dave here.

Was reading some feedback on this piece over at http://www.bearinsider.com (Cal Bears forum) that was pointing out that my comment that &quot;With Kevin Riley (sacked 19 times last season) likely to be asked to just run a safe offense this season and let his running backs do the work&quot; wasn&#039;t really indicative of Tedford&#039;s enthusiasm for the offense this year.

This is a fair point. I don&#039;t doubt that Tedford and ex-Utes offensive coordinator Andy Ludwig will definitely be more creative than simple run-run-pass. I didn&#039;t word it as well as I could have; I just meant that Cal&#039;s running game will be it&#039;s bread and butter, and Kevin Riley will be asked to make smart decisions with the football (be safe and keep the turnovers down). By safe, I didn&#039;t mean to infer that the offense was going to be boring/vanilla, but it did read that way.

Anyway, just wanted to clarify. Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone, Dave here.</p>
<p>Was reading some feedback on this piece over at <a href="http://www.bearinsider.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bearinsider.com</a> (Cal Bears forum) that was pointing out that my comment that &#8220;With Kevin Riley (sacked 19 times last season) likely to be asked to just run a safe offense this season and let his running backs do the work&#8221; wasn&#8217;t really indicative of Tedford&#8217;s enthusiasm for the offense this year.</p>
<p>This is a fair point. I don&#8217;t doubt that Tedford and ex-Utes offensive coordinator Andy Ludwig will definitely be more creative than simple run-run-pass. I didn&#8217;t word it as well as I could have; I just meant that Cal&#8217;s running game will be it&#8217;s bread and butter, and Kevin Riley will be asked to make smart decisions with the football (be safe and keep the turnovers down). By safe, I didn&#8217;t mean to infer that the offense was going to be boring/vanilla, but it did read that way.</p>
<p>Anyway, just wanted to clarify. Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
